<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Fri, 24 May 2013 10:47:10 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Blog</title><subtitle>Blog</subtitle><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-10-19T22:05:36Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>A Whole New "it" Brain</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/10/19/a-whole-new-it-brain.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/10/19/a-whole-new-it-brain.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2012-10-19T21:45:34Z</published><updated>2012-10-19T21:45:34Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The popular book <span style="text-decoration: underline;">A Whole New Mind</span> by Daniel Pink, exemplifies a new movement towards rebalancing our left and right brain hemispheres. He postures that the high paying executive jobs now filled with left-brain information types will be replaced by the new desirables &ndash; the &ldquo;creatives&rdquo;, who are more in tune with their right side. Our current educational system encourages left brain thinking while art schools tend to encourage the right. Even though Betty Edward&rsquo;s book, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Drawing from the Right Side of the Brain</span>, has become a household phrase, our right side has been belittled and downplayed as the lesser brain functioning power for decades. The key is probably somewhere in the middle, to create a balance between both sides for a healthier, happier, productive and functioning society. <br /> <br /> In meditation the left brain (words, analytical judgments, etc) is subdued so the right side (spatial, timeless) can better evoke the desired calm. In <span class="st">Kimon </span>Nicolaides&rsquo; best-selling book, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Natural Way to Draw</span> he writes that while focused in the right side of the brain there can be no mistakes. In meditation, just as in creating art, the right side is dominant. It is interesting that both meditation groups and attendance in art workshops are gaining in popularity. The activity of viewing art, however, offers another opportunity to utilize the right side as well. &nbsp;<br /> <br /> In the act of seeing, our eyes have the ability to perceive two different ways: optically and tactilely, and each of us tends to favor one over the other. Seeing optically we focus on the light and dark qualities and color. Seeing tactilely our eyes extend tiny illusionary &ldquo;hands&rdquo; outwards almost like touching the viewed objects, and we see sculpturally noticing the tactile qualities. Those favoring the tactile approach first notice a painting&rsquo;s surface quality or texture. When next visiting a museum or gallery, take a moment and notice where your eyes wander; what attracts them, and what remains unnoticed on the walls. When artists give attention to all aspects of an artwork; the light and dark, the color, and sensuousness of the surface, then the artwork has the potential to attract a wider audience by appealing to both types of viewers.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Painting Ideas with Acrylic “Skins”</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/10/17/painting-ideas-with-acrylic-skins.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/10/17/painting-ideas-with-acrylic-skins.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2012-10-17T22:07:46Z</published><updated>2012-10-17T22:07:46Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>What&rsquo;s a skin?</strong> It&rsquo;s a separate piece of acrylic without any backing or support. &nbsp;Any acrylic product when applied to a non-stick surface and left to dry, can be peeled off producing a piece of acrylic with no backing. This piece of acrylic, or &ldquo;skin&rdquo; can be used as a collage item in a painting, or as an entire layer of a painting.</p>
<p><strong>What non-stick surfaces will work?</strong> Plastic garbage bags, plastic painting drop cloths at home improvement stores that are whitish and cloudy, plexi sheets called HDPE (High Density Polyethylene), Freezer Paper (found in grocery stores &ndash; not to be confused with wax paper) and protective plastic binder sheets found in office supply stores.</p>
<p><strong>Which type of acrylic works best?</strong> The quick answer is that any acrylic product will make a skin. But to delve a bit deeper, let&rsquo;s start by thinking of acrylic in two broad categories. There&rsquo;s paint and binder. Acrylic paint has color, while binders come in 3 basic types: mediums, gels and pastes. So any paint, medium, gel or paste can create a skin, which means a skin can come in any color, opacity/transparency, thickness, sheen, texture or combination.</p>
<p><strong>Some painting ideas with skins:</strong></p>
<p>Make a variety of skins and store them for later use by stacking them together with freezer paper in between so they don&rsquo;t stick together.</p>
<p>Cut the skins into specific shapes with scissors and glue them onto an acrylic painting using a gel as glue.</p>
<p>Roll them into shapes to add a three-dimensional relief onto the painting surface.<br /><br />Create large sheets of clear skins, paint something different on each one, then arrange one on top of the other to create different effects (pictured below)<br /><br /><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nancyreyner.com/storage/blog2.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1350511870597" alt="" width="197" height="148" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nancyreyner.com/storage/blog1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1350512097866" alt="" width="201" height="150" /></span></span> <em>photos from Nancy Reyner's book, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Acrylic Innovation</span>.</em><br /><br />Create large sheets of translucent skins by using matte gels, or thin layers of paste, and adhere over a painting to create the illusion of depth. Optionally you can continue to paint over this skin, or add another skin layer.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Viewing Paintings</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/6/10/viewing-paintings.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/6/10/viewing-paintings.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2012-06-10T22:29:23Z</published><updated>2012-06-10T22:29:23Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>A previous blog article I wrote on the &ldquo;S&rdquo; curve stimulated some email questions on how to see subtle underlying shapes, such as the classic &ldquo;S&rdquo; curve in paintings. Negative space, (or the illusion of space perceived in between forms) is perceived via our lesser used right brain hemisphere, while shapes or defined forms are seen with our more frequently used left brain. <br /> <br /> As an experiment, place your hand flat on a table in front of you with fingers spread out. Our left brain takes control right away and so we see our fingers. I believe it is difficult if not impossible to see from both sides of our brain at the same time. Now try to look at the spaces in between the fingers by keeping your eyes fixed on those spaces, until our eyes turn them into interesting shapes. You will need to switch from left to right brain hemispheres to fully view those spaces in between the fingers. Our left brain is our default system, so it is easier to look at forms while it takes more of a conscious effort to see the spaces in between. In paintings to see the space in between the forms takes more of a conscious effort too. <br /> <br /> To find subtle forms in a painting then, requires a conscious switch between our two brain hemispheres while viewing the painting, and also as artists, while painting it. When we allow ourselves time to view a painting with our right brain (viewing the negative spaces), you will begin to see or form larger geometric patterns such as the "S" curve I mentioned. Each work of art generally uses at least one geometric shape as an overriding principle to hold the smaller shapes together. Other common geometric shapes found in paintings are diamonds, pyramids, circles and squares. These are forms that we as humans will naturally impose onto images. I believe that any painting you find interesting, be it an Old Masters famous painting from the Renaissance, or a contemporary one in a local gallery, will have some form of underlying geometry in its composition. <br /> <br /></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>What's a Glaze?</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/6/10/whats-a-glaze.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/6/10/whats-a-glaze.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2012-06-10T14:05:42Z</published><updated>2012-06-10T14:05:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Even though I&rsquo;ve written several articles on glazing I came to realize that &ldquo;glazing&rdquo; is often misunderstood and could use some defining. So, what is a glaze? The most common answer is that a glaze is transparent. Well, that may be true, but that is only one part of the answer. My definition of a glaze is a bit fuller: &ldquo;a subtle transparent evenly applied layer of color&rdquo;. Let&rsquo;s look at why I define it this way.</p>
<p>The new modern pigment colors (ie Quinacridones, Phthalos, Dioxazine) are often called transparent, so can these be used as glazes? Not by themselves, and here is why. When they are applied thickly they are opaque. When they are applied thinly they are transparent but are so incredibly vibrant that they will overpower anything they overlay.</p>
<p>Let&rsquo;s take a moment and ask why we care about glazes anyway. When would using a glaze be an appropriate technique? Let&rsquo;s say you were painting a portrait commission in a realistic style, and after months of hard work the portrait was as perfect as you can get it. Continuing this imaginary scenario you then proudly show the portrait to your client who feels the skin tone is overall too yellow. So what do you do? Argue with the client? Not a good idea. Take the painting back to your studio, remix all the colors and repaint the entire face again? Also not a good idea. There is an easier solution. Applying a transparent layer of a purple color (purple is the opposite or complement of yellow on the color wheel) to neutralize the yellow coloring.</p>
<p>So now lets get back to our discussion of the modern colors. By wrongly assuming that any modern color is transparent and therefore by itself would make a good glaze, we could grab our tube of Dioxazine Purple and apply it thinly (so it&rsquo;s transparent) over the entire portrait face. Now to our horror we see that this purple color, even though it is transparent is so intense it has turned the face to a vivid purple. We could try to convince our client that this modern style might be a better approach to their portrait, or we could take another look at my definition of a glaze again. Being transparent isn&rsquo;t enough for a glaze to be of help in a situation like this. Remember the full definition of a glaze is &ldquo;a subtle transparent evenly applied layer of color&rdquo;. So still using the Dioxazine Purple we have the transparency, but how do we get the &ldquo;subtle evenly applied&rdquo; qualities?</p>
<p>Start a mixture on the palette using a clear polymer medium (if you are working with acrylic) and add a very small amount of the Dioxazine Purple (about 1 part paint to 10 parts medium), mix it really well with a knife so it&rsquo;s all homogenized, making the color more subtle. To apply it evenly, however, we need to slow down the drying time. Adding up to 15% retarder to this mixture will slow down the drying. Another alternative is to use Acrylic Glazing Liquid (contains 15% retarder to 85% polymer medium gloss) for your medium. Now with a smooth flat brush, apply this mixture (1 part Dioxazine Purple to 10 parts slow drying medium) in a very thin application to obtain an evenly applied transparent layer of color. And voila (!) our overly yellow portrait is now neutralized to a more acceptable flesh tone. Use glazing for shifting colors as well as many other uses.<br /><br />Even though my directions are for use with acrylic paints, the same applies with oil. Just substitute an oil medium instead of the acrylic mediums I mentioned.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Secret Tricks to Pouring Acrylic</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/1/31/secret-tricks-to-pouring-acrylic.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/1/31/secret-tricks-to-pouring-acrylic.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2012-01-31T16:46:50Z</published><updated>2012-01-31T16:46:50Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>How do you get that cool effect? Contemporary paintings are notorious for sporting a wide variety of special effects, especially when the imagery is abstract. Most of these effects, I have found, are obtained by pouring. Pouring is a simple concept. It&rsquo;s a way of applying paint without using brushes, knives or other application tools. Just grab a large container of acrylic medium and pour it out onto a surface. Simple? Yes. Messy? Yes. Easy? Often, no.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nancyreyner.com/storage/pouring-1a.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328028559527" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Pouring is most commonly used to get a &ldquo;surfboard finish&rdquo;; a super glossy, brushless and smooth rich layer of color or clear coating on a painting. This is often obtained by using toxic resins. However, there are ways to get the same results with non-toxic acrylic. (This is the focus of my pouring presentation, recorded live, and available for purchase in a 70 minute DVD for $20. If interested please email Nancy at <a href="mailto: nancy@nancyreyner.com">nancy@nancyreyner.com</a>)</p>
<p>In addition to the surfboard finish, pouring can offer some new and unusual special effects to your work. With pouring its easy to think of Jackson Pollock. It can be a great way to add some fun into your painting process, smooth out unwanted texture on your surface, get marbleized effects, and rich colored glazes.</p>
<p>Here are some basic tips from my DVD to get a flawless &ldquo;surfboard finish&rdquo;:</p>
<p>(1) Use a rigid surface to keep from buckling while drying.</p>
<p>(2) Use a medium that is made specifically for pouring, like Golden&rsquo;s GAC800. If using other fluid mediums, such as Clear Tar Gel or Self-Leveling Gel, dilute up to 40% with water and spread thinly to avoid crevicing.</p>
<p>(3) Apply a stain sealer, then prime the surface before pouring to keep stains from coming through the surface into the poured medium.</p>
<p>(4) Pour on a surface that is level, so while it dries it won&rsquo;t shift.</p>
<p>(5) Immediately spray with alcohol after pouring and spreading to eliminate bubbles.</p>
<p>(6) For deep pours apply duct tape around the edges like a wall, seal the seam with a gel, then pour as deep as you want using GAC800. This is the only medium that I know of that can be poured deeper than &frac14;&rdquo; without crevicing.</p>
<p>Other techniques covered in the DVD: Smoothing out a textured surface; Deep pouring &amp; embedding; Transparent and Opaque Colored Pours; Poured Collage Shapes; &ldquo;Dirty Mix&rdquo; Pours; Jackson Pollock Drizzle Pours; Marbleized Pours</p>
<p>This 70 minute DVD, Secret Tricks to Pouring Acrylic, will be available for purchase (by March 1,  2012) for $20. If interested please email <a href="mailto: nancy@nancyreyner.com">nancy@nancyreyner.com</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>I Don’t Get It!?</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/1/31/i-dont-get-it.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2012/1/31/i-dont-get-it.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2012-01-31T16:06:24Z</published><updated>2012-01-31T16:06:24Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Ever been to a museum or art gallery and can&rsquo;t figure out why a painting is on exhibit? It may not look finished, make sense, feel attractive, or give any idea of its meaning. I recently received an email from a New York City artist asking for help in understanding a painting by the surrealist Yves Tanguy (pictured below) that he saw in the Museum of Modern Art, titled &ldquo;He Did What He Wanted&rdquo;, painted in1927. In his email the artist said he tried to figure it out, knew it was surreal, but still felt lost. Even the wisest of us can feel a bit miffed while viewing an art exhibition. Here are some ideas I have on this topic:</p>
<p><strong>Art comes in a wide variety</strong><br /> Our world is diverse. There are many different types and styles of paintings, as well as people, each of us with a different perspective, different ways of viewing and creating art. So it follows that there will always be some art we prefer, others we don't, and some that we will not comprehend, and may not care to either. If you don&rsquo;t understand it, or like it, just move on until you find one that interests you.</p>
<p><strong>Being on display does not always designate quality<br /> </strong>Museums are educational institutions. They collect art for a wide variety of reasons, but in general try to purchase works that had an impact in the way we now view art history. Viewing an artwork on display in a museum, with our contemporary eyes, may not give us any connection unless we know about that artist or artwork, or have donned a pair of headphones. Even if this artwork is created by a designated &ldquo;master&rdquo;, this may not be their best work. That is because great masters like all artists, created a wide variety of&nbsp; works, and some may be great while others are lukewarm. Museums may only be able to purchase a lesser quality work by a master due to finances or market availability. Keep in mind that just because a work of art is in a museum it may not be of high quality, and it may not speak to us.</p>
<p>If the work doesn't communicate anything to you, then let it go and move on to another image that does. Its more fun to keep looking for work that moves us then spend time with ones that don't. When I go to a museum I give myself one and a half hours max. After that I no longer have the viewing attention. In that time I wander around in search of one painting that will really move me. Once I find that one work I will stand in front of it for long periods of time to soak it in. What I am soaking in is not always intellectual or analyzed, but more emotional or felt. I go to a museum for that experience, not to see if I can understand all the works that are on display. Sometimes I will go to a certain exhibit to see what the curator had in mind - try to figure out what the educational message is from the show as a whole. But in general I like to view art for the "high", the emotional and spiritual impact I can get. This, then, gives me motivation to keep painting, to see that art does and continues to have value to the human spirit.<br /> <br /> <strong>About Ives Tanguy<br /> </strong>As I first mentioned, in the email that inspired this article was a painting by Ives Tanguy. Here is a link to read more about him. <br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yves_Tanguy">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yves_Tanguy</a><br /> <br /> He is very well known as one of the surrealist masters. I am not drawn to this particular work of his, however, I am aware that paintings look very different in person then from a photograph. The full impact of a work of art comes from all the factors, some of which are missing when the work transfers from paint to photograph: factors such as size, surface texture and sheen, quality of the pigment and color refracted by light, handling of the paint, and the artists "signature" in the brushstrokes. So I will keep from making any judgments until my next trip to New York. <br /> <br /> <strong>Surrealism<br /> </strong>Surrealism is an important movement in art history, and is still a major influence in contemporary work. Here is a link to read more about surrealism:<br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrealism">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrealism</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrealism"><br /> </a><br /> During the time when surrealism was popular to a specific group of artists, there were other parallel movements in the culture such as the early development of contemporary psychology. Surrealism is based on our collective unconscious, so images, forms, shapes and colors are utilized to create a dream-like state in the viewer, and to evoke personal connections. This was a big deviation from other works of that time, that strove to create a very specific place, time and snapshot of reality. This particular work by Tanguy presents a grouping of forms (geometric and "real") in a landscape that will mean different things to each of us. As Carl Jung discovered, there are certain forms that mean the same thing to us, thus forming our collective, which is better stated in his books on the collective unconscious. When we look at historic works with contemporary eyes we may not find anything of interest. I do believe, though, that a really great work of art will connect to our human spirit in some way throughout time. <br /><br /> <span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.nancyreyner.com/storage/Yves-Tanguy.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328026129907" alt="" /></span></span>Ives Tanguy, "He Did What He Wanted", 1927</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Space-y Thoughts on Painting</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/10/19/space-y-thoughts-on-painting.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/10/19/space-y-thoughts-on-painting.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2011-10-19T17:45:43Z</published><updated>2011-10-19T17:45:43Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>"Space.....the final frontier, where no man has gone before". Does anyone still remember that famous opening line from Star Trek? It's been coming to my mind lately since I will be offering a talk entitled: Transitional Space in the Creative Process.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The location venue where I will be speaking has monthly art talks, attended mostly by artists, so I am looking forward to keeping the talk open, throwing out some thoughts on the topic, sprinkling in a few new concepts, and allowing time for open forum discussion. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Here are some of my current thoughts so far on the topic: </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Both "space" and "transition" are vital words for art and artists. As a painter, my work is presented in a two dimensional format of paint on canvas. Engaging a viewer by moving an image from the flat format into the experience of three dimensions is my greatest challenge. In my opinion, powerful painting expresses this experience of space, along with the potential to move the viewer's experience from the mundane to divine. Painting then, creates the space to transition the viewer's experience.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Space as it relates to art, can be seen metaphorically and literally; and plays an important role in art-making. From the architecture of my studio space to the objects and images positioned in my periphery, these all affect the work itself often emerging into the image like shadows. A certain mental space is required too, as I paint from both sides of my brain, alternating left- and right-brain modes with a constant flow. Space is needed to transition from everyday thinking to the inner psychological space necessary for me to do my work.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Got any thoughts on this? Then please join me!</span></p>
<p>Nancy Reyner talk: Transitional Space in the Creative Process.</p>
<p>Thursday, November 3, 2011; 6-7 pm at Destiny Allison Fine Art Gallery,</p>
<p>7 Caliente Road in Santa Fe,<br />(in Eldorado's La Tienda center - first intersection off 2nd Eldorado Entrance).</p>
<p>For more info and to make reservations for the talk please call (505) 428-0024<br />or email destinyallison@aol.com</p>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Zen &amp; the Art of Viewing a Painting</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/9/6/zen-the-art-of-viewing-a-painting.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/9/6/zen-the-art-of-viewing-a-painting.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2011-09-06T23:54:37Z</published><updated>2011-09-06T23:54:37Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p class="Body1">When watching a film or listening to music there is a linear way these works of art unfold to our eye or ear. A movie and a music performance both take a fixed amount of time to absorb from start to finish. While viewing a painting we might not be aware of a similar linear process that's involved. I've heard through museum researchers that the average time a person looks at a painting is 3 seconds. It is possible (and probably the norm) to take in a lot of visual stimuli all at once whether viewing a painting or just being in every day life. Obviously there is no fixed amount of time to view a painting, however I have found that if I slow down the viewing process while taking in a painting, my eyes seem to move through the piece like they're on a road trip.</p>
<p class="Body1">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="Body1">I spent some time investigating this phenomenon and found that I tend to view a painting starting on the left side and working my way across towards the right. I wonder if this is related to the fact that as an American I read from left to right. Perhaps those in other countries whose language is read from right to left might find the reverse is true. At any rate, paintings are their most inviting when there is some "entrance" on the left side of the painting. This could be anything that creates a diagonal movement into the work. It could be a light ray, a path, a tree branch, a figure, a brushstroke, anything that has an angle. If, however, there is some shape or form on the far left that is completely vertical, running up and down along the left side of the painting, then it can create a visual barrier. Without some sort of inviting angle, the viewer might not be compelled to look at the painting for more than a quick glance.</p>
<p class="Body1">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="Body1">After some practice of viewing paintings in slow motion I have found even more surprising discoveries. Once the eye gains entrance on the left, it will happily move towards something bright colored, or something with high contrast that contains a light value (like white) next to a dark value (like black). This just scratches the surface of the visual tendencies I've found. If anyone is interested perhaps I'll write more in my next blog. In conclusion, I have found that the more the eye can travel on a journey through the painting, the longer the viewing experience, and the more potential for creating a fulfilling visual and aesthetic experience.</p>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Adding a Warm Glow</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/8/21/adding-a-warm-glow.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/8/21/adding-a-warm-glow.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2011-08-22T01:18:40Z</published><updated>2011-08-22T01:18:40Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p class="Body1">A painter emailed me about his recent acrylic landscape. He said it looked realistic but did not have the uplifting feeling that says "buy me". He wrote, "I then applied a mat glaze of yellow to warm it up, but it looked like a boring painting with a yellow mat glaze. I then gave it a yellow gloss glaze hoping for a beautiful day, the sun's out feeling, but it looked like a dull painting with two glazes! Please help!"</p>
<p class="Body1">First I would like to suggest to add more faith in your process, reducing the amount of energy that goes into frustration when the painting doesn't look INCREDIBLE every time you do one layer, one brush stroke, one thing. Doubting, frustration and critical judging at each step is usually a waste of time and energy. It also puts you in a place of indecision.</p>
<p class="Body1">So that said, now a few tips on glazing techniques.</p>
<p class="Body1">(A glaze is a transparent mixture made with about 50-70% medium and the remaining amount with paint color. For more information on this please see the several previous blog entries I've made on this site on glazing).</p>
<p class="Body1">With acrylic I noticed that it takes 3 or 4 layers of a glaze to equal the refraction that oil offers in 1 layer. So when you decide to add a yellow glaze over your painting to warm it up, first apply one layer of a glaze made with a warm yellow like Cadmium Medium or Hansa Yellow Medium. Then when that dries, apply another layer of a cool yellow glaze like Green Gold or Hansa Yellow Light. When that dries add yet another layer of a high powered modern color glaze like Nickel Azo Gold.</p>
<p class="Body1">As you apply each layer try to apply it unevenly, so that you have more of the color on one side or one area then the other. (I like to accomplish this not by using more quantity of glaze - I like THIN glazes - but by applying pure medium in some areas first, then when the glaze goes over that area it becomes more transparent.) Then when you apply the next layer change the way this next color is applied (more color - less transparent on a different side or area than the last layer). This way you are adding a yellow tone to the painting, but you are also creating a richer quality by using multiple layers. And working with it unevenly adds to the illusion of depth much more than when you apply equal layers that change the whole surface of the painting the same.</p>
<p class="Body1">Another tip: To get an antique effect, or add a warm feeling to a painting (especially great with landscapes or portraits) I like to use a glaze of Quinacridone Nickel Azo Gold. These paint colors are incredibly rich, so use extremely small amounts of the color in larger quantities of medium. Test a glaze prior to use for strength of color before applying it directly to your painting by applying it over an unused surface or piece of paper, then blow dry it for fast results.</p>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Lickable Art</title><id>http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/7/1/lickable-art.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nancyreyner.com/blog/2011/7/1/lickable-art.html"/><author><name>Nancy Reyner</name></author><published>2011-07-01T16:28:37Z</published><updated>2011-07-01T16:28:37Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Over dinner last night with my friend <a href="http://www.destinyallison.com/">Destiny Allison</a>, I was describing my litmus test for paintings that I liked by using the word &ldquo;lick-able&rdquo;. She laughed about it, and agreed that the tactile quality or sensuousness of the painted surface is an important factor for her too. After dinner while viewing a nearby gallery&rsquo;s exhibition, I found that I would first go very close to each painting, practically sticking my nose in them, to see what the surface was like. I noticed that many of the paintings had a thin layer of paint - not as interesting as a glaze or a wash - just a simple plain layer that had no seductive quality to it. A glaze would be a thin layer that glows with the extra medium in it, and a wash would sink into the surface creating an interesting stain. No, these artists were obviously oblivious to surface quality, and used the paint sparingly, almost as if they were afraid of using too much paint. Or maybe afraid of the paint itself. In other words, I didn&rsquo;t feel like licking, touching or otherwise longingly gazing over the surface. I also noticed that it didn&rsquo;t matter whether the paintings were abstract or realistic, and unless first entranced by the surface, I never stuck around long enough to notice the subject matter. When a painter has the intent to create a seductive surface that supports the image or subject matter of the piece, the painting, in my opinion, moves into a higher realm by engaging more sensory experiences. And when the painter has a surface consciousness while painting, it adds this dimension naturally. This surface quality I am writing about is not to be confused with texture. Texture can add a tactile quality and make the surface more interesting (sometimes) but that&rsquo;s not what I&rsquo;m talking about here. Georgia O&rsquo;Keeffe&rsquo;s paintings have a wonderful lickable quality while the paint is, in general, fairly smoothly applied. If you look closely at her work (in person, of course) you can see her brush strokes moving in various playful directions holding a variety of paint qualities. Yum!!! I would gladly bet that Georgia herself actually thought of licking the surface with her brush while painting. I mean, come on, we can enjoy the simple surface qualities of photographs and prints, but a real live painting in person when painted with the intent to create a seductive surface will get me every time!</p>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry></feed>